Source: Pixabay
This article is for informational purposes and should not be construed as financial or legal advice.
Layer-1 blockchains offer an independent structure that supports smart contracts and decentralized apps. Ethereum has been a dominant figure in this category for nearly a decade. Many new players have been introduced to the game in the last few years. Solana is a fast-rising competitor in the layer-1 space and a platform with a huge investment potential.
Ethereum’s advantages include a long tradition, developer loyalty, and a huge ecosystem. Solana has a rapidly spreading blockchain with excellent transaction speed. Which of these should win an investor’s vote in 2025? Here’s a guide that displays all the differences and discusses the specifics of Solana and Ethereum.
Solana’s Proof-of-History vs Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake
A consensus mechanism is crucial for a blockchain’s security and efficiency. Ethereum initially used the proof-of-work mechanism but migrated to the proof-of-stake in 2022. It was a huge switch for the network that managed to reduce the digital footprint and improve transaction speed.
The proof-of-stake involves staking or locking up the coins that users own to validate transactions. Solana took things to the next level by implementing the proof-of-history method. PoH adds a timestamp to each block to establish the order of events on the chain.
The idea behind the PoH concept is that the order of transactions contributes to the network’s integrity. Setting the timeline also speeds up the transactions, increasing Solana’s capability to process more transfers per second. Solana has a clear speed advantage, but some claim that security and decentralization are on Ethereum’s side.
As for the network’s reliability, both networks should be reliable. However, Solana had several network outage problems in the past, which have compromised its reputation.
Transaction Speed and Network Efficiency
If we solely focus on speed, Solana would be the clear winner of this showdown. Its theoretical maximum is more than 65,000 transfers per second. The actual performance already showed that the chain can process 3-4 thousands of transactions each second. The completion time for a transfer is 0.4 seconds under normal conditions. These statistics should be enough to get a Solana calculator and acquire SOL coins.
On the other hand, Ethereum can handle no more than 15-30 TPS. Some layer-2 solutions like Optimism improve this number significantly. It can take up to 5 minutes for a transaction to finalize on Ethereum, and it’s not uncommon for the network to face congestion.
Here are some insights on how this reflects on both networks:
- Decentralized finance. If you choose Solana for trades, instant swaps reduce the risk of slippage.
- NFTs. Solana wins in this category since it’s faster and more affordable to mine and buy coins.
- Gaming and dApps. Ethereum has a larger ecosystem with a wider selection of dApps available.
Gas Fees and Cost Per Transaction
Source: Pexels
Ethereum faces network congestion frequently. As a result, its gas fees are quite volatile. That volatility means that you could end up paying significant sums per transfer. A few years ago, these charges went up to $15 or more. Even if they aren’t close to that nowadays, most investors find that Ethereum transactions are quite expensive. Many migrate to layer-2 solutions to ensure they spend less per transfer than on the mainnet.
Solana charges a fraction of a dollar per transfer, so you could end up paying less than $0.01 per transaction. That affordability makes the network attractive not only for traders but for developers as well. It’s part of why Solana’s dApp engagement is increasing and attracting new users.
Developer Ecosystem and dApp Growth
Ethereum has been the dominant smart contract blockchain for years. The coin’s spot in market cap rankings has consistently been right below Bitcoin. The network can be proud to have a huge number of developers and host thousands of decentralized applications in its robust infrastructure. Some examples of Ethereum dApps include MakerDAO, Aave, Uniswap, and OpenSea. Many NFT marketplaces and decentralized exchanges are on this network.
Solana also has hundreds of different dApps across different categories. From gaming apps to NFTs and DeFi solutions, you can find a wide range of software solutions on this network. With a large number of active and in-development projects, Solana is growing fast.
Considering that it’s a newer network, Solana seems to be a better option for web3 decentralized apps. These are next-gen solutions, and Solana seems more equipped to support innovation, especially since Ethereum has significant gas charges. On the other hand, Ethereum still seems more reliable since it has proven stability and integrity over the years.
Community and Institutional Backing
Solana Foundation is a non-profit organization established to help the network maintain optimal security and decentralization while increasing adoption. It launched the Grants Program to enhance censorship resistance. There’s also a Delegation Program for validators, which has the goal of reducing criticism regarding centralization. If a validator meets specific requirements, Solana chooses them for delegation.
Ethereum has gained considerable institutional trust over the years. Many companies, including J.P. Morgan and Microsoft, are a part of the Enterprise Alliance. Some reputable financial institutions have built their dApp solutions on this blockchain. If you decide to buy crypto with credit card, more platforms will support Ethereum, although Solana is available on major platforms.
Final Thoughts for Investors
It’s hard to choose a clear winner in the Solana vs Ethereum showdown, with each network having pros and cons. From a trader’s perspective, Solana might be a higher risk. However, that also means that better rewards are available in case of a positive outcome.
On the other hand, Ethereum seems a better choice for long-term traders. That’s particularly true for those investors who are institutionally minded. Ultimately, you should consider your investment goals and timeline. If you need fast transactions, choose Solana. But if you want maximum reliability, you can’t go wrong with Ethereum. Pick based on your preference and stay informed. Keeping track of the latest news is important because things change in the crypto industry in the blink of an eye.